Predicting Individual Brand Value Using a Random Forest Model: A Data-Driven Approach to Organizational Influence
PDF

Keywords

Individual Brand Value
Random Forest
Machine Learning in Management
Non-Linear Modeling
Organizational Influence
Market Positioning

Abstract

Individual brand value has become a strategic asset in contemporary organizations, yet existing research has predominantly relied on linear models to explain its formation. Such approaches assume additive and proportional effects, potentially oversimplifying the complex and contingent nature of brand development. This study introduces a Random Forest framework to examine how organizational structure, market positioning, and social–cultural context jointly shape individual brand value. Using survey data from 318 participants, the predictive performance of the Random Forest model is compared with that of a traditional multiple linear regression model. The results show that the Random Forest model achieves substantially higher explanatory power (R² = 0.72) than the linear benchmark (R² = 0.54), indicating that non-linear relationships and higher-order interactions play a central role in brand formation. Permutation-based importance analysis reveals a hierarchical pattern in which market positioning variables, particularly visibility and differentiation, exert the strongest influence, followed by organizational structure and social–cultural context. These findings suggest that individual brand value is not the linear accumulation of internal attributes but an emergent outcome of externally visible differentiation, conditionally enabled by organizational arrangements and socially interpreted within cultural environments. Methodologically, the study demonstrates how machine learning can complement theory-driven models by uncovering structural regularities that remain invisible under linear assumptions. The results call for a pluralistic analytical approach capable of aligning empirical methods with the complexity of organizational life.

https://doi.org/10.70693/itphss.v3i1.273
PDF

References

Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building strong brands. Free Press.

Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.3.216

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

Gandini, A. (2016). Digital work: Self-branding and social capital in the freelance knowledge economy. Marketing Theory, 16(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593115607942

Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2017). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction (2nd ed.). Springer.

Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8415

Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56

Mullainathan, S., & Spiess, J. (2017). Machine learning: An applied econometric approach. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.87

Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x

Peters, T. (1997). The brand called you. Fast Company, 10, 83–90.

Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069452

Shmueli, G. (2010). To explain or to predict? Statistical Science, 25(3), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1214/10-STS330

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002

Varian, H. R. (2014). Big data: New tricks for econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.3

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Liusong Yang, Chenlu Yu, Tianrui Zhang, Wei Yet Tan